“Debate over efficacy of sanctions continues”

“Debate over efficacy of sanctions continues”
February 10 & 11, 2010
     Amidst efforts to gain support for new UNSC sanctions against Iran, the US has imposed new unilateral sanctions targeting Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) (Al Jazeera). However, Ulrike Putz believes Iran’s decision to enrich its LEU is the latest demonstration of a long pattern of Iranian “indifference” to threats of sanctions. Citing a Brookings Institution article from last September, Putz argues that economic growth and rising living standards in Iran over the past 10 years render sanctions ineffective for pressuring the regime’s leaders. Putz adds that sanctions such as a gasoline boycott are unlikely to be effective due to the need for Chinese support (Spiegel).
     Mark Dubowitz counters that sanctions are working to undermine Tehran’s domestic credibility on economic issues, citing a November letter by 60 Iranian economists criticizing the regime for “[scaring] off” foreign investment and causing “heavy damage” to the economy. Dubowitz argues that energy sanctions targeting Iran’s dependence on gasoline imports are part of a “comprehensive economic warfare strategy” that has had “some success” at weakening the IRGC and feeding public discontent against the regime (Foreign Policy).
Al Jazeera | Spiegel | Foreign Policy

Related posts
“Growing economic concerns add to Tehran’s troubles”
“Washington, Tehran both keeping door open for nuclear fuel deal”


0 Responses to ““Debate over efficacy of sanctions continues””

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: